U.S. SENATE – U.S. Senator Steve Daines today spoke with Lawrence Zlatkin in a Senate Finance Committee hearing about U.S. leadership in and taxation of cryptocurrency. Read the highlights below.
Watch the full exchange HERE.
Daines on U.S. leadership in cryptocurrency:
Daines: Our country has played such an important role in the advancement of the digital asset industry. However, the uncertainty our digital asset industry now faces risks chilling innovation here at home and displacing U.S. leadership in cryptocurrency abroad. This is a global race and whoever goes the fastest is going to win. Without clear rules of the road, these taxpayers and innovators face ambiguity and are forced to rely on general tax principles and sub-regulatory guidance. If we don’t get our tax code right, we will lose our lead in this space. We’re going to push jobs and money overseas and stall any growth from this industry. When I fought for permanency in the One Big Beautiful Bill, American leadership was one of the main motivators. We won that battle a few months ago, and I’m going to ensure we win on this battle as well. More than 50 million Americans are invested in cryptocurrency, and as this number grows, the more important it becomes to deliver certainty and stability to the American people. Given the progress my colleagues and this Congress have made this year with passage of the GENIUS Act and the ongoing development of digital asset market structure legislation, this Committee needs to do our part to address the tax side of the ledger. That is why I am proud to announce that I’ve started working on putting together a framework that will provide much-needed clarity to protect American jobs, revenue, and competition.
Daines on clarity for taxpayers:
Daines: The SEC recently issued guidance allowing for exchange traded products, ETPs, to stake the crypto they hold. This follows other regulatory efforts this year by the SEC to increase access to crypto for everyday investors through cryptocurrency ETPs. These regulatory developments will result in more American taxpayers holding investments and ETPs, which I commend. As popularity around crypto ETP products grows, so too does the imperative of providing clarity and certainty to U.S. taxpayers by ensuring our tax code accommodates this unique and innovative feature offered by crypto focused products. For example, staking is a feature that underlies much of the value proposition for investing in proof of stake crypto and is an important incentive for investors. However, the current rules and limitations for grantor trusts do not contemplate novel concepts such as the staking of digital assets, leaving many taxpayers relying solely on advice from well-meaning accountants as to whether these tax structures are viable investment vehicles in the first place. Mr. Zlatkin, given your expertise in digital assets, can you explain why it’s important that any comprehensive crypto tax package that will cement U.S. leadership and innovation in digital assets provides certainty and clarity around the use of structures like grantor trusts for crypto ETPs?
Zlatkin: This is actually a relatively simple fix.
###
Contact: Matt Lloyd, Gabby Wiggins